Abstract

Discussions about race and racism are very difficult among psychoanalysts, and are often polarizing. This article argues that the conception of Whiteness as the pathogenic agent of our social ills has created a good deal of animosity that has interfered with the goals of examining structural racism in psychoanalysis, as in the rest of society. The concept of Whiteness is compared to the scientific racism of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Both constructions are manifestations of essentialism. Epistemic trust and mistrust, potential malignant polarization, and a back-fire effect occur, which distracts from paying enough attention to critical social problems at the moment. Terror Management Theory, fear of one’s mortality, is postulated to result in the avoidance of open discussions about differences. Group discussions utilizing deliberative norms are more productive than the usual psychoanalytic style of free and open-ended discussions, which often promote polarization. Can there be a recovery of epistemic trust among analysts who have similar values but may strongly disagree on the right course to follow? Understanding and addressing the difficulties of discussion among psychoanalysts can contribute to addressing these issues in the social realm.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.