Abstract

We greatly appreciate that orthodontic research on patient decision aids has finally appeared in the world's leading orthodontic journal, the AJO-DO.1Parker K. Cunningham S.J. Petrie A. Ryan F.S. Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision-making aid for orthodontics.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 152: 154-160Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar Decision aids have already been adopted and used for years in other fields of medicine. However, this randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid for orthodontics contains, in our opinion, 2 serious flaws. First and most importantly, the authors neither cited nor discussed a previous study2Marshman Z. Eddaiki A. Bekker H.L. Benson P.E. Development and evaluation of a patient decision aid for young people and parents considering fixed orthodontic appliances.J Orthod. 2016; 43: 276-287Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar on a patient decision aid for fixed orthodontic appliances that had a diametrically opposite result to their study. Whereas the former found a significant decrease in decisional conflict in patients receiving decision aids, Parker et al1Parker K. Cunningham S.J. Petrie A. Ryan F.S. Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision-making aid for orthodontics.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 152: 154-160Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar found no significant reduction in decisional conflict between the group using the decision aid and the control group. The quality of the study of Parker et al would without doubt have benefited from a discussion of the results of Marshman et al2Marshman Z. Eddaiki A. Bekker H.L. Benson P.E. Development and evaluation of a patient decision aid for young people and parents considering fixed orthodontic appliances.J Orthod. 2016; 43: 276-287Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar and would probably explain the contradictory results and push forward the development of decision aids in orthodontics. Second, Parker et al1Parker K. Cunningham S.J. Petrie A. Ryan F.S. Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision-making aid for orthodontics.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 152: 154-160Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar neither presented nor gave details about the content of the decision aid itself. For instance, they did not explicitly state which risks from fixed orthodontic appliances were listed in the decision aid and how they were presented, as absolute or relative risks. The quality of the information and the format of its presentation may have crucial impacts on patients' understanding of decision aids.3International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDA) Collaboration.http://ipdas.ohri.ca/Google Scholar Both studies would profit from a more detailed and critical generation and presentation of their information and the way this information is presented to the patients (images vs text) because those 2 factors strongly influence understanding and consequently a patient's decisional capacity. Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision-making aid for orthodonticsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsVol. 152Issue 2PreviewPatient decision-making aids (PDAs) are instruments that facilitate shared decision making and enable patients to reach informed, individual decisions regarding health care. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of a PDA compared with traditional information provision for adolescent patients considering fixed appliance orthodontic treatment. Full-Text PDF Authors' responseAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsVol. 153Issue 3PreviewThank you for your letter regarding our research, “Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision-making aid for orthodontics.”1 We appreciate your interest in the research and your valuable comments. Full-Text PDF

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call