Abstract
Nine dispersants were tested at the high energy setting (Figure 2). Five dispersants that performed well at high energy were then tested at the low energy setting (Figure 3).Each test case was completed in triplicate. Four of the dispersants tested did not perform any better than the control tests (see Figure 2). Three dispersants (Corexit 9500a, Corexit 9527a and Finasol OSR 52) clearly performed better than all of the others. These dispersants generated smaller oil-drop sized dispersions in the form of classic cafe-au-lait clouds. The Dispersit SPC 1000 and JD-2000 dispersants also worked well at the high-energy setting but neither of these dispersants generated small drop sized cafe-au-lait clouds of dispersed oil. High Energy SL Ross Wave Tank Test Results
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
