Water-mass formation and Sverdrup dynamics; a comparison between climatology and a coupled ocean-atmosphere model

Abstract

The coupled ocean-atmosphere model integrations of Manabe and Stouffer (1988) are compared with climatological distributions of depth-integrated flow and water-mass formation. The description of the ocean circulation in their two quasi-stable equilibria is extended to include an analysis of the horizontal and meridional transport as well as the water-mass formation and vertical motion in the model. In particular, the wind-driven Sverdrup flow is computed and compared with the actual mass transport streamfunction of the model. It is found that a Sverdrup model of depth-integrated flow captures the major features of the coupled model's ocean circulation, except near region of deep water formation, where the thermohaline field drives ocean currents and wind-driven flow becomes secondary. The coupled model fails to allow for a barotropic mass transport through the Indonesian Passage. Instead, only baroclinically driven fluxes of heat and freshwater are resolved through the Indonesian Archipelago. The Sverdrup model suggests that a barotropic throughflow would transport about 16 Sv from the Pacific to Indian Oceans. According to Sverdrup dynamics, this would serve to weaken the East Australian Current by about 16 Sv and strengthen the Agulhas Current by the same amount. Recent integrations of a World Ocean model with and without a barotropic throughflow in the Indonesian Passage suggest that the modelled heat transport is sensitive to the nature of flow through the Indonesian Archipelago. From' a comparison of observed and simulated water mass properties, it is shown that some major aspects of the global-scale water masses are not captured by the coupled model. This reveals a shortcoming of the model's ability to represent the global-scale heat and freshwater balances. For example, there is an unrealistically intense halocline in the immediate vicinity of Antartica, prohibiting the formation of bottom water in the Weddell and Ross Seas. Also, no low salinity traces of Antarctic or North Pacific Intermediate Water appear in the model integrations, primarily because there is no source of sufficiently dense bottom water adjacent to Antarctica. Without this dense bottom water, the “would-be” intermediate water at 60°S sinks to great depths and actually becomes the model ocean's bottom water. Then, the simulated bottom water is too fresh and warm in the climate model, matching the temperature—salinity signature of Antarctic Intermediate Water. In the North Atlantic, whilst deep water formation appears in one of the climate states of Manabe and Stouffer (1988), its downward penetration is not as deep as observed. This is because their deep North Atlantic is not ventilated by the thermohaline overturning of warm salty North Atlantic Deep Water. Instead, a deep overturning cell centred near the equator transports relatively fresh water into the region. In contrast, the location and strength of Central Water formation agrees well with climatology.