Abstract

Waterlogging is expected to increase as a consequence of global climate change, constraining crop production in various parts of the world. This study assessed tolerance to 14-days of early- or late-stage waterlogging of the major winter crops wheat, barley, rapeseed and field pea. Aerenchyma formation in adventitious roots, leaf physiological parameters (net photosynthesis, stomatal and mesophyll conductances, chlorophyll fluorescence), shoot and root growth during and after waterlogging, and seed production were evaluated. Wheat produced adventitious roots with 20–22% of aerenchyma, photosynthesis was maintained during waterlogging, and seed production was 86 and 71% of controls for early- and late-waterlogging events. In barley and rapeseed, plants were less affected by early- than by late-waterlogging. Barley adventitious roots contained 19% aerenchyma, whereas rapeseed did not form aerenchyma. In barley, photosynthesis was reduced during early-waterlogging mainly by stomatal limitations, and by non-stomatal constraints (lower mesophyll conductance and damage to photosynthetic apparatus as revealed by chlorophyll fluorescence) during late-waterlogging. In rapeseed, photosynthesis was mostly reduced by non-stomatal limitations during early- and late-waterlogging, which also impacted shoot and root growth. Early-waterlogged plants of both barley and rapeseed were able to recover in growth upon drainage, and seed production reached ca. 79–85% of the controls, while late-waterlogged plants only attained 26–32% in seed production. Field pea showed no ability to develop root aerenchyma when waterlogged, and its photosynthesis (and stomatal and mesophyll conductances) was rapidly decreased by the stress. Consequently, waterlogging drastically reduced field pea seed production to 6% of controls both at early- and late-stages with plants being unable to resume growth upon drainage. In conclusion, wheat generates a set of adaptive responses to withstand 14 days of waterlogging, barley and rapeseed can still produce significant yield if transiently waterlogged during early plant stages but are more adversely impacted at the late stage, and field pea is not suitable for areas prone to waterlogging events of 14 days at either growth stage.

Highlights

  • Over the last decades, the number of waterlogging episodes on croplands has increased worldwide, mainly due to more intense and unpredictable rainfalls associated with climate change (Hirabayashi et al, 2013; Core Writing Team et al, 2014)

  • 73% higher Pn values compared to controls were observed in previously waterlogged plants 1 week before maturity (Figure 1A), which showed a 42% higher shoot relative growth rates (RGR) compared to controls during the 99–130 days after sowing (DAS) period (Figure 4A)

  • In barley and rapeseed the growth stage when the stress occurred was critical for determining the effects on leaf physiological performance, dry mass responses and seed production

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The number of waterlogging episodes on croplands has increased worldwide, mainly due to more intense and unpredictable rainfalls associated with climate change (Hirabayashi et al, 2013; Core Writing Team et al, 2014). Soils with significant content of clay or intensely compacted by the repeated use of agricultural machinery can experience poor drainage, entailing an increase in waterlogging occurrence (Jackson, 2004). Waterlogging impacts around 16% of soils in United States, affecting irrigated areas of India, China, and Pakistan (Pang et al, 2004). To illustrate economic losses associated with waterlogging or floods, in the United States the lost crop production was around $360 million per year during 2010–2016, and was even a greater loss than caused by drought in three out of the 7 years (Pedersen et al, 2017; USDA, 2017). Soil waterlogging is a major abiotic stress of increasing importance, and it causes significant yield losses of various crops. It is necessary to understand how crop plants respond to waterlogging to identify traits contributing to tolerance

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call