Abstract

Abstract. In this study backward trajectories from the tropical lower stratosphere were calculated for the Northern Hemisphere (NH) winters 1995–1996, 1997–1998 (El Niño) and 1998–1999 (La Niña) and summers 1996, 1997 and 1999 using both ERA-40 reanalysis data of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) and coupled Chemistry-Climate Model (CCM) data. The calculated trajectories were analysed to determine the distribution of points where individual air masses encounter the minimum temperature and thus minimum water vapour mixing ratio during their ascent through the tropical tropopause layer (TTL) into the stratosphere. The geographical distribution of these dehydration points and the local conditions there determine the overall water vapour entry into the stratosphere. Results of two CCMs are presented: the ECHAM4.L39(DLR)/CHEM (hereafter: E39/C) from the German Aerospace Center (DLR) and the Freie Universität Berlin Climate Middle Atmosphere Model with interactive chemistry (hereafter: FUB-CMAM-CHEM). In the FUB-CMAM-CHEM model the minimum temperatures are overestimated by about 9 K in NH winter and about 3 K in NH summer, resulting in too high water vapour entry values compared to ERA-40. However, the geographical distribution of dehydration points is fairly similar to ERA-40 for NH winter 1995–1996 and 1998–1999. The distribution of dehydration points in the boreal summer 1996 suggests an influence of the Indian monsoon upon the water vapour transport. The E39/C model displays a temperature bias of about +5 K. Hence, the minimum water vapour mixing ratios are higher relative to ERA-40. The geographical distribution of dehydration points is fairly well in NH winter 1995–1996 and 1997–1998 with respect to ERA-40. The distribution is not reproduced for the NH winter 1998–1999 (La Niña event) compared to ERA-40. There is an excessive water vapour flux through warm regions e.g. Africa in the NH winter and summer. The possible influence of the Indian monsoon on the transport is not seen in the boreal summer 1996. Further, the residence times of air parcels in the TTL were derived from the trajectory calculations. The analysis of the residence times reveals that in both CCMs residence times in the TTL are lower compared to ERA-40 and the seasonal variation is hardly present.

Highlights

  • Water vapour is the most important greenhouse gas (GHG) in the atmosphere

  • The geographical distribution of dehydration points is in good agreement with the reference ure 2d shows that the Western Pacific contributed 44% to the calculation and the location of the minimum temperatures are entire stratospheric water vapour

  • As in the refing the El Nino winter, while the contribution from the West erence the geographical distribution of dehydration points is Pacific drops to 24%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Water vapour is the most important greenhouse gas (GHG) in the atmosphere. In contrast to tropospheric warming, water vapour leads to a radiative cooling in the stratosphere (Forster and Shine, 1999). Water vapour in the stratosphere results from two processes. About one third or less (depending on altitude and latitude) comes from the oxidation of methane. The majority of stratospheric water vapour comes from the direct flux of water vapour from the troposphere into the stratosphere through the tropical tropopause layer (TTL) The humid tropospheric air is freeze dried when moving through the cold tropical tropopause Brewer, 1949), a process that is very sensitive to temperature and Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union The humid tropospheric air is freeze dried when moving through the cold tropical tropopause (e.g. Brewer, 1949), a process that is very sensitive to temperature and Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call