Abstract

AbstractWater requirements of early‐maturing (EM) maize hybrids might be lower than those of late‐maturing (LM) maize hybrids. This study aimed to analyze the effects of different irrigation management on grain yield (GY), water uptake patterns, evaporation (E), and transpiration (T) of two maize hybrids differing in maturity via stable isotope method. The field experiment with 36 lysimeters (4‐m wide × 4‐m long) under rain‐shelters was conducted with an EM (DH518) and a mid‐maturing and LM (DH605) hybrid with three replicates from 2021 to 2022. Maize plants were grown under three irrigation amounts (W1, W2, and W3 were irrigated to maintain soil moisture at 45%, 60%, and 75% of field capacity, respectively) by flood irrigation (FI) and drip irrigation (DI) under rain‐out shelters. Results showed that GY and evapotranspiration (ET) of EM were 8% and 12% lower, while the crop water productivity (CWP) was 6% higher than that of LM. Water uptake of both hybrids occurred mainly within 0‐ to 60‐cm soil layer during the vegetative stage. Water uptake of both hybrids occurred mainly within 0‐ to 60‐cm soil layer during the vegetative stage. Summer maize under FI absorbed more water from the deep soil layer than DI in the late growth stage. Compared with LM, the water absorption depth of EM became shallower in the late growth stage. Water uptake of maize was mainly from the deeper soil under water stress conditions. E of total ET accounts for 43% under DI and 57% under FI; GY and CWP were 22% and 51% higher than those of FI. Together with choosing EM hybrids, optimization of water management with DIW3 could achieve higher GY and CWP. The optimization of irrigation method and hybrids could provide a reference for local farmers to improve GY and CWP.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call