Water use and water-use efficiency of the invasive Centaurea maculosa and three native grasses

Abstract

The Eurasian herb Centaurea maculosa Lam. has invaded millions of hectares of semi-arid grasslands in western North America. Its success may reflect that it may be more competitive than native species, it is not grazed by large herbivores, it was introduced without its native enemies, it may interfere with native species via allelopathy, or most likely some combination of these factors. Greater competitive ability could include greater use of limiting soil resources, such as water, or more efficient use of soil water, thereby inhibiting establishment, survival, and reproduction of native species. We measured water use and water-use efficiency of Centaurea and three native grasses, Pseudoroegneria spicata [Scribn. and Smith] A. Love, Pascopyrum smithii [Rybd.] A. Love, and Festuca idahoensis Elmer, in a glasshouse. Water-use efficiency was determined by the traditional measure of biomass produced per mass of water used, and by carbon-isotope discrimination (Δ). Centaurea did not use the most water, or use water more efficiently (based on biomass (g)/ water (kg) and carbon-isotope discrimination) than all three native grasses. We also determined carbon-isotope discrimination of Centaurea and dominant native grasses during the 1999 and 2000 growing seasons at three field sites. Centaurea rosettes had the lowest water-use efficiency (greatest carbon-isotope discrimination), followed by mature plants of Centaurea, and then native grasses. Water-use efficiency of mature Centaurea plants and native grasses was greater in late summer than early summer. Centaurea's success as an invasive species in North America cannot be attributed to greater use of soil water or greater water-use efficiency than native grasses.