Abstract

Relatively low phytoplankton production among lakes of the Mackenzie Delta has been attributed to light limitation in frequently flooded lakes and to nutrient limitation among infrequently flooded lakes; productivity peaks have been attributed to optimal light–nutrient conditions at intermediate flood frequency. We found that the distribution and abundance of phytoplankton among a large number of lakes was explained by optimal light–nutrient conditions but not by nutrient or light limitation. For a subset of lakes, seasonal dynamics of biomass were consistent with light limitation and optimal light–nutrient conditions but not nutrient limitation; photosynthetic rates were consistent with optimal light–nutrient conditions and nutrient limitation but not light limitation. Results of dilution–deletion experiments across a light–nutrient gradient indicated transition from light limitation to optimal light–nutrient conditions to nutrient limitation. Surprisingly, adding river water to lake water did not increase photosynthetic rates; this result and experimental incubations in situ during river inflow and lake outflow suggested that continuous supply of river water may be necessary to increase phytoplankton growth rates. Among infrequently flooded lakes, phytoplankton response to nutrient additions showed that phosphorus (P) limitation was no more likely than nitrogen (N) limitation, co-limitation, or no limitation by N or P.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call