Abstract

Responsive polymer brushes possess many interesting properties that enable them to control a range of important interfacial behaviours, including adhesion, wettability, surface adsorption, friction, flow and motility. The ability to design a macromolecular response to a wide variety of external stimuli makes polymer brushes an exciting class of functional materials, and has been made possible by advances in modern controlled polymerization techniques. In this review we discuss the physics of polymer brush response along with a summary of the techniques used in their synthesis. We then review the various stimuli that can be used to switch brush conformation; temperature, solvent quality, pH and ionic strength as well as the relatively new area of electric field actuation We discuss examples of devices that utilise brush conformational change, before highlighting other potential applications of responsive brushes in real world devices.

Highlights

  • Why Polymer Brushes? The Physics of Brush ResponsePolymer brushes are formed when polymer chains are tethered at one end to a surface at sufficient density to overlap and stretch away from the surface

  • Zhou and Huck [65] demonstrated that AFM microcantilevers grafted on one side with a poly[2-(methacrylolyloxy)ethyl] trimethyl ammonium chloride (PMETAC) strong polyelectrolyte brush layer could be actuated by the application of a voltage between the tip holder and a remote electrode within a liquid cell containing weak salt solutions

  • The name “polymer brush” can really refer to many things, though these varied systems all have the defining feature of having polymer chains grafted at one end to a substrate at sufficient density to overlap and stretch away from the surface

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Polymer brushes are formed when polymer chains are tethered at one end to a surface at sufficient density to overlap and stretch away from the surface. These nanoscale surface layers are “smart”, i.e., their properties can be switched in response to external triggers [1], and are prime candidate. When poolymer chainns are grafted at one ennd to a surfface at sufficient densitty to allow the chains to t o overlap, theyy stretch aw way from thhe surface innto a brush-like conform mation [11]]. As the grafting density increases, and the grafting distance decreases, the polymer molecules are increasingly stretched away from the surface in a brush-like equilibrium conformation. In polyelectrolyte brushes, where electrical charges are present upon the polymer chains, electrostatic interactions become important either directly through repulsive interactions between charged monomers, or indirectly since they dictate the distribution and the osmotic pressure of the counterion cloud which remains bound to the brush to preserve electroneutrality

Alexander—de Gennes Brush Model
Attachingg Brushes to t a Surfacce or an Intterface
Brushess via “Graft fting To”
Brushes via “Grafting From”
Is Polydispersity Important?
Temperaature Respoonsive Brusshes and PE
Polyelectrolyte Brushes
Neutral Brush
Osmotic Brush
Polyelecctrolyte Bruush Experim ments
Applicatiions and Deevices
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.