Abstract

Maintaining and improving water quality is key to the protection and restoration of aquatic ecosystems, which provide important benefits to society. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) defines water quality based on a set of biological, hydro-morphological and chemical targets, and aims to reach good quality conditions in all river bodies by the year 2027. While recently it has been argued that achieving these goals will deliver and enhance ecosystem services, in particular recreational services, there is little empirical evidence demonstrating so. Here we test the hypothesis that good water quality is associated with increased utilization of recreational services, combining four surveys covering walking, boating, fishing and swimming visits, together with water quality data for all water bodies in eight River Basin Districts (RBDs) in England. We compared the percentage of visits in areas of good water quality to a set of null models accounting for population density, income, age distribution, travel distance, public access, and substitutability. We expect such association to be positive, at least for fishing (which relies on fish stocks) and swimming (with direct contact to water). We also test if these services have stronger association with water quality relative to boating and walking alongside rivers, canals or lakeshores. In only two of eight RBDs (Northumbria and Anglian) were both criteria met (positive association, strongest for fishing and swimming) when comparing to at least one of the null models. This conclusion is robust to variations in dataset size. Our study suggests that achieving the WFD water quality goals may not enhance recreational ecosystem services, and calls for further empirical research on the connection between water quality and ecosystem services.

Highlights

  • Water is one of the most regulated areas in European Union (EU) environmental policy, covering topics as diverse as drinking water [1], bathing water [2], and groundwater [3]

  • All null models predict that the rate of visits to good/high water status sites is lowest in the Thames River Basin Districts (RBDs) and generally high (>15%) in the North West, Humber, Severn, and South West RBDs

  • Detailed exploration of these regional differences is beyond the scope of this paper, but as potential explanations we suggest regional idiosyncrasies in (i) demography, with younger people being more critical of water quality [49], (ii) frequency of recreational water use, with more frequent water users more sensitive to differences in water status [52], (iii) relative importance of site choice factors, in that residents of more urbanized RBDs may be less sensitive to water status, (iv) differences in typical travel distances for different populations in different regions of England, (v) attachment to specific sites irrespective of water quality, through force of habit [53,54] or marketing of specific sites [55]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Water is one of the most regulated areas in European Union (EU) environmental policy, covering topics as diverse as drinking water [1], bathing water [2], and groundwater [3]. The WFD quality assessment is based on a measurement scale that rates ecological characteristics as ‘high’, ‘good’, ‘moderate’, ‘poor’ or ‘bad’, and chemical characteristics as either ‘good’ or ‘fail’. These metrics are assessed against reference conditions before “major industrialisation, urbanisation and intensification of agriculture” [7]. The overall substantive policy goal of the WFD is to achieve ‘good’ or ‘high’ overall status of both surface- and groundwaters across Europe by 2027, and to protect water bodies from further deterioration. Good overall status is defined by high/good state in both ecological and chemical conditions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call