Abstract
Biologically active molecules create substitutes in liquid water by forming single-domain ferroelectric crystallites. These nanoparticles are spherical and constitute growing chains. The dipoles are aligned, but can be set in oscillation at the frequency of vibration of the charged part of active molecules. They are then automatically trimmed and become information carriers. Moreover, they produce an oscillating electric field, causing autocatalytic multiplication of identical chains in the course of successive dilutions. Active molecules are thus only required to initiate this process. Normally, they excite their specific receptors by resonance, but trimmed chains have the same effect. This theory is confirmed by many measurements.
Highlights
The concept of water memory is based on experimental results of measurements, published 30 years ago in the prestigious scientific journal Nature [1]
The spectrum fs = sf1 is said to be a “harmonic” one. These properties are well-known in physics, but everyone should see why a chain of water pearls (WPs) with free ends does only allow for standing waves
Since Benveniste knew that this was not true, because of numerous tests, he tried to understand the new observed facts. He realized that tubes with genuine extra-high dilutions (EHDs) of active molecules had been placed during some time near tubes that contained merely pure water
Summary
The concept of water memory is based on experimental results of measurements, published 30 years ago in the prestigious scientific journal Nature [1] This astonishing phenomenon had been discovered by Jacques Benveniste and his collaborators, but one month later, the same journal declared that it was a delusion [2]. The editor in chief, John Maddox, declared that “there is no physical basis for such an activity” and announced even that independent investigators would “observe repetitions of the experiments”. When they arrived at Benveniste’s laboratory, it turned out that John Maddox was accompanied by the professional magician James Randi and the debunker of scientific fraud Walter Steward.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
