Abstract
This study compares two water injection patterns (line drive and five-spot) using CMG software in a cubic reservoir model based on Buzergan field data. Line drive injection showed higher water cut rates due to direct water flow, while the five-spot pattern distributes water flow across the area, resulting in lower water cuts. Economic analysis favors the line drive pattern for its lower setup cost and reduced water injection requirements. These findings offer insights for optimizing injection patterns and maximizing oil production in reservoir management. Highligt: Injection Pattern Comparison: Direct vs. Distributed Water Flow Analysis. CMG Software Simulation: Accurate Reservoir Modeling and Analysis Tool. Cost-Effective Optimization: Maximizing Oil Production with Economical Injection Strategies. Keyword: Water Injection Patterns, CMG Software, Reservoir Management, Oil Production Optimization, Economic Analysis
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
