Abstract
Accurate quantification of the terrestrial water cycle relies on combinations of multisource datasets. This analysis uses data from remotely sensed, in-situ, and reanalysis records to quantify the terrestrial water budget/balance and component uncertainties in the upper Chao Phraya River Basin from May 2002 to April 2020. Three closure techniques are applied to merge independent records of water budget components, creating up to 72 probabilistic realizations of the monthly water budget for the upper Chao Phraya River Basin. An artificial neural network (ANN) model is used to gap-fill data in and between GRACE and GRACE-FO-based terrestrial water storage anomalies. The ANN model performed well with r ≥ 0.95, NRMSE = 0.24 − 0.37, and NSE ≥ 0.89 during the calibration and validation phases. The cumulative residual error in the water budget ensemble mean accounts for ~15% of the ensemble mean for both the precipitation and evapotranspiration. An increasing trend of 0.03 mm month−1 in the residual errors may be partially attributable to increases in human activity and the relative redistribution of biases among other water budget variables. All three closure techniques show similar directions of constraints (i.e., wet or dry bias) in water budget variables with slightly different magnitudes. Our quantification of water budget residual errors may help benchmark regional hydroclimate models for understanding the past, present, and future status of water budget components and effectively manage regional water resources, especially during hydroclimate extremes.
Highlights
The terrestrial water cycle governs water and food security, hydrologic extremes, and ecosystem health [1]
We provide a water budget assessment over the upper Chao Phraya River Basin (CPRB), Thailand
We developed a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (ANN) model for filling data gaps in and between Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE-FO terrestrial water storage anomalies (TWSA) time series
Summary
The terrestrial water cycle governs water and food security, hydrologic extremes, and ecosystem health [1]. Increasing human activities are altering the global and regional terrestrial water balance directly (e.g., water abstraction and infrastructure development) and indirectly (e.g., deforestation and increasing atmospheric greenhouse gases alter hydroclimate) [2,3]. Amid this integrated complexity between the natural water cycle and human activities, it is imperative to quantify water cycle components and their governing factors towards effective management, efficient water allocation, sustainable and strategic planning, and policymaking, especially for socioeconomically sensitive hydrologic systems [4,5,6,7]. These assessments provide knowledge of the mean state and variability of the water budget, which is fundamental to understanding the regional climate system and characterizing memories, pathways, and feedbacks between key energy, water, and biogeochemical cycles [1,7]. 4.0/).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.