“Water-borne Soil” Hybridity and Divided Traditions in Toni Morrison’s Sula

Abstract

nsideringthe “hyphenated identities”present in America, the present essay addressesthe role of fragmentation, identity and identification, and tradition in the African American experience as portrayed in Toni Morrison’s Sula. Through the lenses of both African American Studies and Identity Studies, the works of Vashti Crutcher Lewis (“African Tradition in Toni Morrison’s Sula”) and Stuart Albert (“The Definition and Metadefinition of Identity”), respectively, will be used to ponder how identity –individual and collective –reacts to strict measurement, and how the experience of African Americans is divided under the two points of reference that compose its nomenclature.1One may ask, then, how traditions which have been forcefully erased make a claim on the present, even when and wherethey are ata disadvantage, and how (if at all) identification is possible when obliteration has already occurred; how traditions and experiences co-exist in an environment which favours hierarchy and limitation. Additionally, how do representations of past traditions move in territories and cultures which reject them, and in what ways is fluidity possible? Can the solution be found in the convergence of the opposed experiences, or is there a side to be picked at all times? In what ways does the revelationof hybridity to oppressed and suppressed societies trigger a self-awareness from which there is no escaping? And what is the role of creation and creativity amidst these tensions, considering that identity is composed by the same questions that challengeit?