Water Accessibility to the Binding Cleft as a Major Switching Factor from Entropy‐Driven to Enthalpy‐Driven Binding of an Alkyl Group by Synthetic Receptors

Abstract

Free energy, enthalpy, and entropy changes in the binding of alkyl pyridines to water-soluble zinc porphyrin receptors with varying accessibility of water to the binding cleft were determined to explain why the driving force of hydrophobic effects is enthalpic in some occasions and entropic in others. Zinc porphyrins bearing four alkyl pillars with terminal solubilizing poly(oxyethylene) (POE) chains of molecular weight of 750 (1), with eight alkyl pillars with terminal solubilizing POE chains of molecular weight of 350 (3), and with eight alkyl pillars with POE of molecular weight of 750 (4) had a binding cleft with decreasing water accessibility in this order as revealed by binding selectivity of imidazole/pyridine. Although all these porphyrins showed that the free energy of binding (-DeltaG(o)) increases linearly as the alkyl group of the guest is lengthened (-DeltaG(o) per CH(2) was 2.6, 2.8, and 2.6 kJ mol(-1) for 1, 3, and 4, respectively), the origin of the free energy gain was much different. Receptor 1 with the most hydrophilic binding site bound the alkyl group by an enthalpic driving force (4-pentylpyridine favored over 4-methylpyridine by DeltaDeltaH(o)=-16.4 kJ mol(-1)), while receptor 4 with the most hydrophobic binding site by an entropic driving force (4-pentylpyridine favored over 4-methylpyridine by DeltaDeltaS(o)=39.6 J K(-1) mol(-1)). Receptor 3 showed intermediate behavior: both enthalpic and entropic terms drove the binding of the alkyl group with the enthalpic driving force being dominant. The binding site of the four-pillared receptor (1) is open and accessible to water molecules, and is more hydrophilic than that of the eight-pillared receptor (4). We propose that the alkyl chains of 1 are exposed to water to produce a room to accommodate the guest to result in enthalpy-driven hydrophobic binding, whereas 4 can accommodate the guest without such structural changes to lead to entropy-driven hydrophobic binding. Therefore, accessibility of water or exposure of the binding site to the water phase switches the driving force of hydrophobic effects from an entropic force to an enthalpic force.