Abstract

Waste incineration technology has received extensive attention for its advantages of being harmless, reducing, and recycling. However, the waste-to-energy incineration project confronts significant "not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) concerns," and irrational location choices will have negative effects on the project's economy and sustainability; it is also a great challenge to the credibility of the government. To this end, a multi-criteria decision-making framework is constructed for the site selection of waste-to-energy incineration projects. To begin with, a site selection criteria system is established including 16 sub-criteria from four aspects, where probabilistic linguistic term sets are introduced to depict the qualitative sub-criteria and probabilistic hesitant fuzzy sets are employed to express the uncertainty of quantitative sub-criteria. An optimization model is then built to determine the weights of criteria based on the Pearson correlation coefficient and least square method. Furthermore, a regret-preference ranking organization methods for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) model is presented to rank alternatives in a heterogeneous decision environment. Finally, a case study in China is conducted to validate the applicability of the proposed framework; the result of the site selection demonstrates that alternative A2 located in Miyun, Beijing, is the most optimal option. This work provides investors with scientific decision reference and also extends the methods in the decision-making field.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call