Abstract
Following recent work by social historians and geographers on the concept of ‘everyday life’, I argue that current historical uses of the term are problematic, at least for environmental historians, in that they lack a sufficiently disciplined or coherent conceptual basis. Henri Lefebvre’s approach to everyday life offers one productive way of rethinking the significance of the environment for social history. Through an empirical study of the politics of urban waste disposal in 20th-century Britain, I deploy some of the key categories of Lefebvre’s ‘critique of everyday life’ to rethinking the social history of environmentalism. I seek to explore what Alex Loftus has called an ‘everyday environmentalism’, arguing that the concept of ‘everyday environmentalism’, with its attention to dialectics, antinomy and contradiction, can transform the ways in which we study the social history of the human relation to nature, which has too often been viewed through reified notions of environmental change. The article concludes that the history of environmental politics should focus far more on environmentalism as a concrete social phenomenon emerging from lived experience.
Highlights
Digital Preservation: The Open Library of Humanities and all its journals are digitally preserved in the CLOCKSS scholarly archive service
I seek to explore what Alex Loftus has called an ‘everyday environmentalism’, arguing that the concept of ‘everyday environmentalism’, with its attention to dialectics, antinomy and contradiction, can transform the ways in which we study the social history of the human relation to nature, which has too often been viewed through reified notions of environmental change
The article concludes that the history of environmental politics should focus far more on environmentalism as a concrete social phenomenon emerging from lived experience
Summary
Following recent work by social historians and geographers on the concept of ‘everyday life’, I argue that current historical uses of the term are problematic, at least for environmental historians, in that they lack a sufficiently disciplined or coherent conceptual basis. Henri Lefebvre’s approach to everyday life offers one productive way of rethinking the significance of the environment for social history. Through an empirical study of the politics of urban waste disposal in 20th-century Britain, I deploy some of the key categories of Lefebvre’s ‘critique of everyday life’ to rethinking the social history of environmentalism. I seek to explore what Alex Loftus has called an ‘everyday environmentalism’, arguing that the concept of ‘everyday environmentalism’, with its attention to dialectics, antinomy and contradiction, can transform the ways in which we study the social history of the human relation to nature, which has too often been viewed through reified notions of environmental change. The article concludes that the history of environmental politics should focus far more on environmentalism as a concrete social phenomenon emerging from lived experience
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
