Abstract
This article demonstrates how Weber's ideal typical Calvinist in choosing between the 'worldly ascetic' and the usual opportunistic way of life confronts Newcomb's problem. Weber's presentation of the Calvinist predicament exemplifies a distinct case of Newcomb's problem with an infallible predictor, but with asymmetry in the auspiciousness of agent's choices. Because of this asymmetry, Weber's presentation is free from the charge of incoherence, to which Newcomb's problem with an infallible predictor is exposed. Weber's qualification of the Calvinist's choice as 'non-logical' reveals the causalism of his preanalytic intuitions about rational choice. His view implies that one of the contributing causes in the emergence of Western capitalism was the conflation between diagnostic and causal relevance of actions. Re-consideration of the Calvinist's predicament in the framework of Robert Nozick's decision value theory provides promising framework for the elaboration of Weberian problematics of 'rationalization', of social action and 'disenchantment' of the world, and shows how the rationality of Calvinist's choice can be vindicated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.