Abstract
It is a well-known fact that the falâsifa had quite extensive knowledge of the philosophy of Plotinus. This chapter shows that there are traces of a knowledge of the Vita Plotini in the Arabic philosophical tradition. Porphyry, the author conclude, was well enough known and well enough thought of by falâsifa to justify his interpreting the material that has its origin in the Vita Plotini as not directed at the philosopher personally either as a man or as an author. In the Life of Plotinus, Porphyry points a finger at Plotinus? carelessness in writing, though this was no more than a lack of regard for form, in common with several other stylistic weaknesses that Porphyry mentions. And in criticising Porphyry?s writing, it was probably no more than the form, the philosopher?s way of expressing himself, that Avicenna wanted to bring to notice, relying on what he found in Vita Plotini . Keywords: Arabic philosophical tradition; falâsifa; philosophy; Plotinus; Vita Plotini
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.