Abstract
ABSTRACTRichard Cross has argued that Bonaventure adhered to the view about the diachronic identity of substances that nowadays goes under the name ‘four-dimensionalism’, and according to which substances persist through time by having different temporal parts at different times. The aim of this paper is to argue that this interpretation is wrong, and that Bonaventure was no four-dimensionalist. Along the way, the paper discusses the conjecture that there is a correspondence between contemporary analytic and high scholastic theories of diachronic identity and presents several lines of research that spring from this conjecture.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
