Abstract
Through culturally contextualising the interlinked spheres of fear/risk/danger/threat, this paper explores the dominant local gender discourses being articulated on the chronically violent boundary zones of Belfast's ‘interface’ communities. In particular, the paper engages with the ‘risk-victimisation paradox’, where women are found to report high levels of fear of violent crime when their levels of victimisation are in fact low, while men consistently report low levels of fear despite higher levels of victimisation. The Belfast case study offers a very different image of gendered spatial use, where men are found to willingly discuss their fear of violent assault and to outline numerous avoidance strategies to escape the possibility of victimisation, while women, in contrast, are those who appear to be daily risk-takers, entering fraught boundary zones and carrying out actions typically avoided by men. The paper questions whether this situation is the result of cultural constructions of masculinity in the Belfast situation which differ from the ‘invulnerable’ model of masculinity which remains one of the dominant representations to be found in the literature.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
