Abstract
International drug policy is undergoing change, and certain types of lay experts, those who have experienced problems with drug use, are getting a more important role. By drawing on 30 in-depth interviews with representatives from drug users’ organizations, bureaucrats and researchers, we explore the rise of lay experts in Norwegian drug policy. We show how these lay experts’ personal credibility is based on a history of serious drug problems, in particular injecting amphetamine or heroin, as well as the ensuing stigma. On an organizational level, lay experts’ roles as service users or patients generate credibility, even if the background is often the users’ experiences of pain and stigma. We document how lay experts have been included and have influenced the Norwegian drug policy process. However, a problem with representativeness remains, as some groups of drug users, for example, young persons, those who mainly use cannabis or benzodiazepines, those involved in crime and those who belong to ethnic minorities, have not been included to the same extent. Thus, the increasing role of lay experts in the Norwegian drug policy process poses some unexpected challenges in terms of the democratization of expertise. This lack of representativeness may be part of the reason why the initially successful reform movement now seems to face a setback.
Highlights
In the Nordic welfare states, crime policy has been described as ‘penal exceptionalism’, as indicated by the low rates of imprisonment (Pratt, 2008)
The Norwegian policy shift has been linked to the increasing importance of representatives of drug users’ organizations (DUOs) in roles as ‘lay experts’ (Grundmann, 2017; Wynne, 1996), individuals whom we would regard as knowledgeable in an area even though they lack formal education
Building on the analysis of establishing credibility in the main part of our article, we provide an assessment of the extent to which the rise of the DUOs in Norwegian drug policy exemplifies a democratization of expertise
Summary
In the Nordic welfare states, crime policy has been described as ‘penal exceptionalism’, as indicated by the low rates of imprisonment (Pratt, 2008). The Drug Policy Reform Committee, chaired by a lawyer from the office of the Director General of Public Prosecutions and with members from the health care sector, researchers and police, included two DUO representatives.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.