Abstract

In a warming ocean, temperature variability imposes intensified peak stress, but offers periods of stress release. While field observations on organismic responses to heatwaves are emerging, experimental evidence is rare and almost lacking for shorter-scale environmental variability. For two major invertebrate predators, we simulated sinusoidal temperature variability (±3 °C) around todays’ warm summer temperatures and around a future warming scenario (+4 °C) over two months, based on high-resolution 15-year temperature data that allowed implementation of realistic seasonal temperature shifts peaking midpoint. Warming decreased sea stars’ (Asterias rubens) energy uptake (Mytilus edulis consumption) and overall growth. Variability around the warming scenario imposed additional stress onto Asterias leading to an earlier collapse in feeding under sinusoidal fluctuations. High-peak temperatures prevented feeding, which was not compensated during phases of stress release (low-temperature peaks). In contrast, increased temperatures increased feeding on Mytilus but not growth rates of the recent invader Hemigrapsus takanoi, irrespective of the scale at which temperature variability was imposed. This study highlights species-specific impacts of warming and identifies temperature variability at the scale of days to weeks/months as important driver of thermal responses. When species’ thermal limits are exceeded, temperature variability represents an additional source of stress as seen from future warming scenarios.

Highlights

  • In a warming ocean, temperature variability imposes intensified peak stress, but offers periods of stress release

  • Energy uptake of A. rubens was significantly affected by mean temperature (GLMER: χ2 = 17.53, p < 0.001), being 86% lower under warm compared to ambient temperature conditions (Tukey test: p < 0.05; Fig. 2A)

  • This was true for final dry weight of A. rubens (GLMER: χ2 = 0.50, p = 0.47; Fig. S2A), and no interactions of factors were found for growths (LMER: F = 1.01, p=0.34) or final dry weight (GLMER: χ2 = 0.76, p = 0.38)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Temperature variability imposes intensified peak stress, but offers periods of stress release. This study highlights species-specific impacts of warming and identifies temperature variability at the scale of days to weeks/months as important driver of thermal responses. Environmental variability occurs at a variety of temporal (and spatial scales), from tidal to diurnal, over stochastic weekly to monthly patterns, and seasonal cycles, to large-scale inter-anneal variability Irrespective of scale, this variability can impact organisms differently than changes in mean temperature (i.e. trends)[5,6]. Between lower and upper pejus temperatures (i.e. lower and upper tolerance limits), basal metabolic rates increase with increasing temperature until maximal levels[30] Outside this window, negative performance is mainly a result of limited maximum metabolic rate due to limited oxygen capacity[30], from where any further drop or rise in temperature will cause severe stress for an individual[31]. Ectotherms, not able to control their body temperature, are most affected by changes in their thermal environmental[41,42], which will likely be impacted by variability patterns

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call