Abstract

PurposeThe aim of the study was to identify solution strategies from a non-governmental (NGO) hospital in a war region for violence-related injuries and to show how high-income countries (HIC) might benefit from this expertise.MethodsNGO trauma hospital in Lashkar Gah, Afghanistan. Four hundred eighty-four war victims admitted in a three month period (February 2016–May 2016) were included. Patients´ characteristics were analyzed.ResultsThe mean age was 23.5 years. Four hundred thirty-four (89.9%) were male, and 50 (10.1%) were female. The most common cause of injury was bullet injuries, shell injuries, and mine injuries. The most common injured body region was the lower extremity, upper extremity, and the chest or the face. Apart from surgical wound care and debridements, which were performed on every wound in the operation theatre, laparotomy was the most common surgical procedure, followed by installation of a chest drainage and amputation.ConclusionThe surgical expertise and clear pathways outweigh modern infrastructure. In case of a mass casualty incident, fast decision-making with basic diagnostic means in order to take rapid measurements for life-saving therapies could make the difference.

Highlights

  • Medical care in low-income countries (LIC) differs a from western medical standards [1]

  • Compared with civilian trauma in LIC, which is mainly caused by road traffic accidents, the injuries in war zones present different patterns with numerous wounds caused by bullets, mines, and bombs [2, 3]

  • The lack of surgical experience might not be relevant as long as a hospital provides a specialist for every probable pathology, but in cases of a sudden high volume of causalities like in a terror attack or train accident, adequate treatment of the injured could get difficult [7, 8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Medical care in low-income countries (LIC) differs a from western medical standards [1]. In high-income countries (HIC), the surgical training focuses early on a specialty. The lack of surgical experience might not be relevant as long as a hospital provides a specialist for every probable pathology, but in cases of a sudden high volume of causalities like in a terror attack or train accident, adequate treatment of the injured could get difficult [7, 8]. In this setting, a specialist for every injured region in one patient would deplete human resources

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call