Abstract

Dong Jingbo, a young faculty member at the China University of Political Science and Law in Beijing, used to teach using only the traditional lecture technique which she had experienced in her own legal education in China and Korea. Until, that is, Professor Dong attended summer workshops given by Pacific McGeorge, in partnership with American University’s Washington College of Law, and also earned an LL.M. at Pacific McGeorge, in the Teaching of Advocacy. Her classes no longer are limited to lecture. She has developed a simulation to use in Chinese criminal law classes, has demonstrated it to other Chinese law professors and has written a law review article about it.2 The simulation is based on a news story about a man who used his wife’s ATM card to make two successive withdrawals of 10,000 RMB, while the receipts reflected a total withdrawal of only 2 RMB, and even though his wife had only 10,000 RMB in her account. The man was charged with theft. Professor Dong assigns students to play the role of the prosecutor, defense counsel and judge. They are given the definition of theft, and must argue and decide the case. She then provides a series of additional facts, requiring deeper analysis. Introduction of this role play into the class builds on learning theory to provide deeper understanding of the elements of the crime of theft than a student could obtain by listening to a lecture. Moreover, this learning by doing encourages analysis, fact development, understanding of the important role of the theory of the case, and independent thinking. For these reasons, and as our experience in China affirms, role play is a useful learning method in traditional, simulation, and clinical law courses.

Highlights

  • Understanding of the elements of the crime of theft than a student could obtain by listening to a lecture

  • As Elliott Milstein noted at our recent training for Chinese law professors in Wuhan, China today calls to mind an earlier moment in the development of U.S legal education, when, in the 1960’s and 1970’s, with support from the Ford Foundation, law schools began an era of experimentation and openness to new ideas, and when new organizations arose to promote clinical legal education.[4]

  • The history of that movement has been marked by continued challenges which persist to the present day, but overall clinical education has advanced in the United States, and the American Bar Association recognizes its importance to legal education.[5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding of the elements of the crime of theft than a student could obtain by listening to a lecture. As Elliott Milstein noted at our recent training for Chinese law professors in Wuhan, China today calls to mind an earlier moment in the development of U.S legal education, when, in the 1960’s and 1970’s, with support from the Ford Foundation, law schools began an era of experimentation and openness to new ideas, and when new organizations arose to promote clinical legal education.[4] This movement promoted skills education and the transmission of values: providing platforms to enable students to learn what it means to be a lawyer, including promotion of a more just society. Our program for Chinese law professors began in 2006 with a “rule of law” grant from the United advocacy skills She is part of the Chinese faculty training other Chinese law professors in experiential legal education, as part of the second phase of our program.

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call