Abstract

It has been suggested that the preference for low WHRs evolved because low WHR provided a cue to female reproductive status and health, and therefore to her reproductive value. The present study aimed to test whether WHR might indeed be a reliable cue to female reproductive history (with lower WHRs indicating lower number of children). Previous studies showed such a relationship for modern and industrialized populations, but it has not been investigated in natural fertility, indigenous, more energy constrained populations facing greater trade-offs in energy allocation than do modern societies. Our sample comprised 925 women aged 13 to 95 years from seven non-industrial societies including tribes from Sub-Saharan Africa (Hadza, Datoga, and Isanzu), Western Siberia (Ob Ugric people: Khanty and Mansi), South America (Tsimane) and South Asia (Minahasans and Sangirese). We demonstrated a culturally stable, significant relationship between number of children and WHR among women, controlling for BMI and age. Based on these data, we suggest that WHR is a reliable cue to female reproductive history, and we discuss our results in the context of previous studies indicating usefulness of WHR as an indicator of health and fertility.

Highlights

  • A woman’s waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is one of the markers of her physical attractiveness and might play role in mate selection

  • Singh originally hypothesized that males had an evolved preference for low female WHR, because low WHR provided a cue to female reproductive status and health, and to her reproductive value[1, 5]

  • The observed effect was statistically significant while controlling body-mass index (BMI) and WHRs that differed across participating societies and generally increased with age in each study population

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A woman’s WHR is one of the markers of her physical attractiveness and might play role in mate selection Studies conducted before and after this hypothesis indicate that WHR as a marker of fat distribution predicts several health disorders, such as cardiovascular diseases, adult-onset diabetes, elevated plasma lipids, hypertension, cancer (endometrial, ovarian and breast), gall bladder disease, depression, high stress level, and overall mortality[1, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20] It needs to be noted, that many of these health problems (heart diseases, diabetes) were probably not evolutionarily relevant[2, 3, 21]. Men appear to be more sensitive to women’s waist circumferences than hip circumferences[33], which is important given that waist size is a more reliable reproductive indicator than is hip width[4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call