Abstract

This study aims to study the efficiency of the Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR) for determining coronary artery disease. It compares the frequency of abnormal WHtR, as a proxy for abdominal obesity, to that of body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). It also relates the findings to other cardiometabolic risk factors in University Hospital patients. A cross-sectional study design was used, where a sample of 200 patients (142 males and 58 females) who attended the adult cardiac clinic were purposively included. BMI, WC, and WHtR were measured, where frequencies of WHtR were compared to those of BMI and WC. The findings were related to the history of coronary artery disease (CAD) and history of cardiometabolic risk factors, including diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), and hyperlipidemia. Majority of the male patients were older, taller, and had a lower BMI value. It also showed that the prevalence of dyslipidemia and CAD was higher in male patients. No significant difference between both genders was noticed for weight, WC, WHtR, hypertension, or DM. BMI was least associated with high-risk cardiac population in both males and females (39.4% and 60.3%), followed by WC (84.5% and 96.6%, respectively). WHtR showed the highest association with gender (male 98.6% and females 98.3%). These findings were noticed in patients with all risk factors. WHtR is superior to BMI and WC for determining the elevated risk of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and CAD in a single university institute. The role of WHtR in both normal and diseased Saudi population should be delineated.

Highlights

  • Academic Editor: Anne Knowlton is study aims to study the efficiency of the Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR) for determining coronary artery disease

  • WHtR has not been studied among the Saudi population, which further drives this research. ereby, to bridge this gap, this study examines the WHtR capability in predicting coronary artery disease

  • It showed that body mass index (BMI) was least associated with highrisk cardiac population for both genders, i.e., males and females (39.4% vs. 60.3%), p 0.0163 followed by waist circumference (WC) (84.5% vs. 96.6%, p 0.008), respectively. e highest association was found for WHtR, which was 98.6% for males and 98.3% for females (p value 0.4969), indicating it as a reliable indicator for coronary artery disease (CAD) risk than the other two, more than BMI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Academic Editor: Anne Knowlton is study aims to study the efficiency of the Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR) for determining coronary artery disease It compares the frequency of abnormal WHtR, as a proxy for abdominal obesity, to that of body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). E findings were related to the history of coronary artery disease (CAD) and history of cardiometabolic risk factors, including diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), and hyperlipidemia. Cardiology Research and Practice [8] has subsequently indicated that the “unhealthy apple shape” is characterized by a preferential deposition of fat in the internal visceral fat rather than in the external subcutaneous fat, which leads to the “healthy pear shape” Several indices, such as waist circumference (WC) and the waist to hip ratio (WHtR), are proposed to assess the visceral fat [9]. Both indices are known for their overestimation or underestimation of cardiometabolic risk in short- and tallheighted people, whose values are required to be adjusted across different races [10]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call