Abstract

BackgroundIn the present study we analyze the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) and future health care costs. On the basis of the relation between these anthropometric measures and mortality, we hypothesized that for all levels of BMI increased WC implies added future health care costs (Hypothesis 1) and for given levels of WC increased BMI entails reduced future health care costs (Hypothesis 2). We furthermore assessed whether a combination of the two measures predicts health care costs better than either individual measure.Research Methodology/Principal FindingsData were obtained from the Danish prospective cohort study Diet, Cancer and Health. The population includes 15,334 men and 16,506 women 50 to 64 years old recruited in 1996 to 1997. The relationship between future health care costs and BMI and WC in combination was analyzed by use of categorized and continuous analyses. The analysis confirms Hypothesis 1, reflecting that an increased level of abdominal fat for a given BMI gives higher health care costs. Hypothesis 2, that BMI had a protective effect for a given WC, was only confirmed in the continuous analysis and for a subgroup of women (BMI<30 kg/m2 and WC <88 cm). The relative magnitude of the estimates supports that the regressions including WC as an explanatory factor provide the best fit to the data.ConclusionThe study showed that WC for given levels of BMI predicts increased health costs, whereas BMI for given WC did not predict health costs except for a lower cost in non-obese women with normal WC. Combining WC and BMI does not give a better prediction of costs than WC alone.

Highlights

  • In epidemiologic research on obesity it is debated whether a combined use of waist circumference (WC) and Body Mass Index (BMI) is a better instrument for identifying high risk individuals [1;2]

  • The reasons for this increased focus are that numerous studies have shown the importance of the body fat distribution as a health risk factor [3], and, secondly, the fact that body mass index (BMI) and WC reflect different body compositions- at the lower end of their distributions

  • BMI is a proxy measure of total body fat and not fat distribution, whereas WC is a proxy measure of abdominal fat mass [4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In epidemiologic research on obesity it is debated whether a combined use of waist circumference (WC) and Body Mass Index (BMI) is a better instrument for identifying high risk individuals [1;2]. A few studies have focused on morbidity in general in the investigation of the combined use of BMI and WC in the identification of high-risk individuals, and the available studies focus on one co-morbidity at a time [5,6,7,8,9,10] This is probably due to the complexity of the problem, which involves a wide range of obesity-related diseases. We assessed whether a combination of the two measures predicts health care costs better than either individual measure

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call