W2050 Response to Acetylcholine and Electrical Field Stimulation On Human Gastric Fundus and Corpus Is Different with That of Human Gastric Antrum

Abstract

Introduction: Motor functions of the stomach have traditionally been regarded to differ by stomach region. However, to date there have been few studies on the gastric contractility of the human stomach. Objectives: The aim of the present study was therefore to examine the response to acetylcholine and electrical field stimulation (EFS) of the human fundus, corpus and antrum. Methods: Gastric muscles were obtained from 71 patients (44 males, 27 females with an average age of 60.7 yrs; 34 85 yrs) undergoing gastric cancer surgery. Muscle strips (n = 71) were isolated and attached to a fixed mount and to an isometric strain gauge. The muscle strips were studied In Vitro for their contractile responses to acetylcholine (n=25) and electrical field stimulation (EFS, n=46). N-nitro-L-arginine (L-NA), atropine and tetrodotoxin (TTX) were added to assess the nitro oxide-mediated changes and cholinergic neural pathway involved in EFS-induced contractions. Results: Spontaneous contractile activity was observed in muscle strips of stomach regions. In the antrum, acetylcholine induced increase in contraction frequency and peak contraction in dose dependent pattern, but no significant change was noticed in muscle tone. In corpus and fundus, acetylcholine induced dose-dependent increase in peak contraction and muscle tone, but there was no significant change in frequency. The response to EFS also differed by stomach region. EFS produced no significant change in contractile activity in 22 of 46 muscle strips. When EFS evoked frequency-dependent contraction or relaxation in muscle strips, contraction was primarily observed in the muscle strips from the antrum, and relaxation was primarily observed in the muscle strips of the corpus and fundus. The addition of LNA (100 uM) to the muscle bath converted the EFS-induced relaxation to contractions and increased the EFS-induced contractions. EFS-induced contractions were abolished by atropine (1uM) or TTX (1uM). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the response to acetylcholine and electrical field stimulation on human gastric fundus and corpus is different with that of human gastric antrum.