Abstract
This contribution deals with the theme of ‘sovereignty’, especially state sovereignty, as a problematic concept that, from legal modernity onwards, falls into crisis and determines multiple aporias. According to the theoretical constructions of the two authors here considered in a diachronic key, Kelsen and Ferrajoli, it should be overcome in favour of an internationalist dimension of law, which can effectively guarantee the protection of fundamental rights and peace, thus approaching the horizon that Kant outlined at the end of the 18th century. This contribution will therefore set out several reasons why such a shift is desirable.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
