Abstract

Trade can allow countries to overcome local or regional losses (shocks) to their food supply, but reliance on international food trade also exposes countries to risks from external perturbations. Countries that are nutritionally or economically dependent on international trade of a commodity may be adversely affected by such shocks. While exposure to shocks has been studied in financial markets, communication networks, and some infrastructure systems, it has received less attention in food-trade networks. Here, we develop a forward shock-propagation model to quantify how trade flows are redistributed under a range of shock scenarios and assess the food-security outcomes by comparing changes in national fish supplies to indices of each country’s nutritional fish dependency. Shock propagation and distribution among regions are modeled on a network of historical bilateral seafood trade data from UN Comtrade using 205 reporting territories grouped into 18 regions. In our model exposure to shocks increases with total imports and the number of import partners. We find that Central and West Africa are the most vulnerable to shocks, with their vulnerability increasing when a willingness-to-pay proxy is included. These findings suggest that countries can reduce their overall vulnerability to shocks by reducing reliance on imports and diversifying food sources. As international seafood trade grows, identifying these types of potential risks and vulnerabilities is important to build a more resilient food system.

Highlights

  • About one fourth of the world’s food production is internationally traded (D’Odorico et al 2014) and this proportion continues to grow

  • The largest trade flows are from Eastern and Southeast Asia to North America, from North America to Eastern Asia, from Southeast Asia to Eastern Asia, and from Northern Europe and Eastern Asia to West Africa

  • Despite the food security benefits that arise from international trade, overreliance on importing major food commodities exposes countries to external shocks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

About one fourth of the world’s food production is internationally traded (D’Odorico et al 2014) and this proportion continues to grow. The increasing globalization of food is driven by decreasing costs of communication and transportation (Iapadre and Tajoli 2014), as well as the benefits of international trade. These benefits include increased competition and variety in international markets, access to capital investments and larger markets, and buffering against local supply shocks (sudden losses). Buffering against local supply shocks occurs when international trade provides access to food following a sudden decrease in food production in one region. In order to evaluate the forward propagation of a shock (transmitted through changes in exports) in a food-trade network, we develop a model that utilizes empirical data on trade flows and includes basic economic realism through proxies for goods substitution and willingness to pay

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call