Abstract

In high-motorisation, car-dependent countries, transport affordability is intimately linked to the price of oil derived motor fuels, which may become increasingly volatile in the future due to global oil price movements and environmental taxation. The negative impacts of fuel price spikes in terms of increased household expenditure and economic stress are unevenly spatially and socially distributed. Previous research has found that vulnerability to fuel price increases is higher in peripheral, peri-urban and rural areas, and that low income tends to be co-located with high car dependence and low vehicle fuel efficiency, with a compounding effect on vulnerability. The goal of this article is to test these hypotheses for England, providing new evidence on spatial patterns of vulnerability to fuel price increases at the small-area level. We propose a composite vulnerability indicator combining data on income, accessibility, vehicle inspection and vehicle registration for 2011. Within English city-regions, we find little evidence of the socially regressive patterns previously identified in the literature. This is explained by the persistent concentration of poverty in urban cores, as well as by the poor fuel economy of the vehicle fleet in wealthier areas, due to the prevalence of powerful vehicles there. On the other hand, our analysis suggests that the impacts of fuel price increases would be very unequal between city-regions, as the least sensitive metropolitan area (Greater London) is also characterised by high levels of adaptive capacity. We conclude by setting out an agenda for future research on spatial vulnerability to fuel price increases.

Highlights

  • Despite the ongoing debate on ‘peak car’ (Goodwin and Van Dender, 2013; Newman and Kenworthy, 2015), motorisation and car use are still increasing globally (Pojani and Stead, 2017), and passenger mobility in developed countries remains car dependent (Jeekel, 2013), with considerable variation between spatial contexts

  • While much is made of the rise of alternative fuels and powertrains, most of the private motor vehicle fleet still consists of internal combustion engine technology running on fossil fuels - with e.g. renewables accounting for just 7% of transport-related energy consumption in the EU in 2016 (Eurostat, 2018)

  • In the remainder of this section, we discuss the findings of previous research on spatial patterns of vulnerability, focusing on two ‘regressive urban structural effects’ that have been highlighted: i) the co-location between areas of low income and high car dependence; ii) the co-location between areas of low income and low fuel efficiency of the vehicle fleet

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite the ongoing debate on ‘peak car’ (Goodwin and Van Dender, 2013; Newman and Kenworthy, 2015), motorisation and car use are still increasing globally (Pojani and Stead, 2017), and passenger mobility in developed countries remains car dependent (Jeekel, 2013), with considerable variation between spatial contexts. In the remainder of this section, we discuss the findings of previous research on spatial patterns of vulnerability, focusing on two ‘regressive urban structural effects’ that have been highlighted: i) the co-location between areas of low income and high car dependence; ii) the co-location between areas of low income and low fuel efficiency of the vehicle fleet. These findings constitute the background for our own investigation of these spatial relationships in England

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call