Abstract

Valuation of soil carbon (C) regulating ecosystem services (ES) at the state level is important for sustainable C management. The objective of this study was to assess the value of regulating ES from soil organic carbon (SOC), soil inorganic carbon (SIC), and total soil carbon (TSC) stocks, based on the concept of the avoided social cost of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions for the state of New Hampshire (NH) in the United States of America (USA) by soil order and county using information from the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) database. The total estimated monetary mid-point value for TSC stocks in the state of New Hampshire was $73.0B (i.e., 73.0 billion U.S. dollars (USD), where B = billion = 109), $64.8B for SOC stocks, and $8.1B for SIC stocks. Soil orders with the highest midpoint value for SOC were Histosols ($33.2B), Spodosols ($20.2B), and Inceptisols ($10.1B). Soil orders with the highest midpoint value for SIC were Inceptisols ($5.8B), Spodosols ($1.0B), and Entisols ($770M, where M = million = 106). Soil orders with the highest midpoint value for TSC were Histosols ($33.8B), Spodosols ($21.2B), and Inceptisols ($15.9B). The counties with the highest midpoint SOC values were Rockingham ($15.4B), Hillsborough ($9.8B), and Coös ($9.2B). The counties with the highest midpoint SIC values were Merrimack ($1.2B), Coös ($1.1B), and Rockingham ($1.0B). The counties with the highest midpoint TSC values were Rockingham ($16.5B), Hillsborough ($10.8B), and Coös ($10.3B). New Hampshire has experienced land use/land cover (LULC) changes between 2001 and 2016. The changes in LULC across the state have not been uniform, but rather have varied by county, soil order, and pre-existing land cover. The counties that have exhibited the most development (e.g., Rockingham, Hillsborough, Merrimack) are those nearest the urban center of Boston, MA. Most soil orders have experienced losses in “low disturbance” land covers (e.g., evergreen forest, hay/pasture) and gains in “high disturbance” land covers (e.g., low-, medium-, and high-intensity developed land). In particular, Histosols are a high-risk carbon “hotspot” that contributes over 50% of the total estimated sequestration of SOC in New Hampshire while covering only 7% of the total land area. Integration of pedodiversity concepts with administrative units can be useful to design soil- and land-cover specific, cost-efficient policies to manage soil C regulating ES in New Hampshire at various administrative levels.

Highlights

  • The ecosystem services (ES) framework is frequently utilized with United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) because it is aimed at the valuation of benefits (ES) and/or ecosystem disservices (ED) people obtain from nature based on three general categories of services: provisioning, regulating/maintenance, and cultural services [2]

  • The specific objective of this study was to assess the value of soil organic carbon (SOC), soil inorganic carbon (SIC), and total soil carbon (TSC) in the state of New Hampshire (USA) based on the social cost of carbon (SC–CO2 ) and avoided emissions provided by carbon sequestration, which the U.S Environmental Protection

  • This study demonstrates the value of regulating ES/ED at the state and county levels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soil carbon regulating ES/ED are associated with the sequestration/stocks of soil organic carbon (SOC) (derived from living matter), soil inorganic carbon (SIC). Soil carbon sequestration in the forms of SOC and SIC is an ES, which results in “avoided” social costs associated with the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2 ) to the atmosphere [3]. Soil resources are primarily valued for their provisioning ES (e.g., food production) with limited consideration of regulating ES (e.g., carbon sequestration), but increased concerns over global warming require assessment of soil ED associated with greenhouse gas emissions from soils [5,6]. Soil C regulating ES/ED are dependent on soil pedodiversity, which defines a soil “portfolio” and its SOC, SIC, and TSC stocks in a geographic area under various land covers [3]. The state of New Hampshire has five soil orders (Entisols, Inceptisols, Histosols, Mollisols, and Spodosols) with soilspecific characteristics and constraints related to soil ES/ED, which are all part of the intricate mosaic of land use/land covers (LULC) within the landscape [7] (Table 1, Figure 1)

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call