Abstract

Abstract. In 2018 and 2019, central Europe was affected by two consecutive extreme dry and hot summers (DH18 and DH19). The DH18 event had severe impacts on ecosystems and likely affected vegetation activity in the subsequent year, for example through depletion of carbon reserves or damage from drought. Such legacies from drought and heat stress can further increase vegetation susceptibility to additional hazards. Temporally compound extremes such as DH18 and DH19 can, therefore, result in an amplification of impacts due to preconditioning effects of past disturbance legacies. Here, we evaluate how these two consecutive extreme summers impacted ecosystems in central Europe and how the vegetation responses to the first compound event (DH18) modulated the impacts of the second (DH19). To quantify changes in vegetation vulnerability to each compound event, we first train a set of statistical models for the period 2001–2017, which are then used to predict the impacts of DH18 and DH19 on enhanced vegetation index (EVI) anomalies from MODIS. These estimates correspond to expected EVI anomalies in DH18 and DH19 based on past sensitivity to climate. Large departures from the predicted values can indicate changes in vulnerability to dry and hot conditions and be used to identify modulating effects by vegetation activity and composition or other environmental factors on observed impacts. We find two regions in which the impacts of the two compound dry and hot (DH) events were significantly stronger than those expected based on previous climate–vegetation relationships. One region, largely dominated by grasslands and crops, showed much stronger impacts than expected in both DH events due to an amplification of their sensitivity to heat and drought, possibly linked to changing background CO2 and temperature conditions. A second region, dominated by forests and grasslands, showed browning from DH18 to DH19, even though dry and hot conditions were partly alleviated in 2019. This browning trajectory was mainly explained by the preconditioning role of DH18 on the impacts of DH19 due to interannual legacy effects and possibly by increased susceptibility to biotic disturbances, which are also promoted by warm conditions. Dry and hot summers are expected to become more frequent in the coming decades, posing a major threat to the stability of European forests. We show that state-of-the-art process-based models could not represent the decline in response to DH19 because they missed the interannual legacy effects from DH18 impacts. These gaps may result in an overestimation of the resilience and stability of temperate ecosystems in future model projections.

Highlights

  • Extreme dry and hot summers in western and central Europe have become more frequent over the past decades (Coumou and Rahmstorf, 2012; Seneviratne et al, 2014), a trend that is expected to continue as global mean temperatures rise (Barriopedro et al, 2011)

  • Following the extreme summer in central Europe in 2018, mild temperatures and strong soil moisture deficits remained until January 2019, when soil moisture anomalies (SManom) returned to normal conditions

  • We propose an approach that analyses this event as a combination of three types of compound events (Zscheischler et al, 2020) that consider (i) the compound effects of hot and dry conditions, (ii) the effect of repeated stress conditions in 2019, and (iii) the legacy effects from DH18 impacts in preconditioning the impacts of DH19

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Extreme dry and hot summers in western and central Europe have become more frequent over the past decades (Coumou and Rahmstorf, 2012; Seneviratne et al, 2014), a trend that is expected to continue as global mean temperatures rise (Barriopedro et al, 2011). After severe drought and heat stress, plant recovery can be lagged, for example due to reduced growth or non-reversible losses in hydraulic conductance or carbon reserve depletion (Ruehr et al, 2019) This in turn may increase vulnerability to another DH if it occurs before complete recovery. Reductions in leaf area, increases in root allocation (McDowell et al, 2008), or reduced growth, caused by reducing evaporative tissue and enhancing water uptake capacity, could confer an advantage to subsequent droughts (Gessler et al, 2020) It remains unclear whether the increased vulnerability to a subsequent drought can be explained by compounding hazards (e.g. accumulated water deficits or compound heat) or modulating effects due to vegetation responses to the first event

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.