Abstract

In this paper we assess the vulnerability of different synthetic complex networks by measuring the traffic performance in presence of intentional nodes and edge attacks. We choose which nodes or edges would be attacked by using several centrality measures, such as: degree, eigenvector and betweenness centrality. In order to obtain some information about the vulnerability of the four different complex networks (random, small world, scale-free and random geometric) we analyze the throughput of these networks when the nodes or the edges are attacked using some of the above mentioned strategies. When attack happens, the bandwidth is reallocated among the flows, which affects the traffic utility. One of the obtained results shows that the scale-free network gives the best flow performance and then comes random networks, small world, and the poorest performance is given by the random geometric networks. This changes dramatically after removing some of the nodes (or edges), giving the biggest performance drop to random and scale-free networks and smallest to random geometric and small world networks.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call