Abstract
Vertical seismic profiling (VSP) is an effective technique to provide high-resolution seismic images of the reservoir area. However, the quality of the images is limited by the poor illumination of primary reflection wave. In conventional VSP imaging, only the upgoing primaries are used. Adding free-surface–related multiples into the imaging process can significantly improve the coverage of the illuminated area. Conventional migration methods using multiples need the complex process of multiple prediction. Data-to-data migration (DDM) is an effective imaging technique for multiples in which the recorded data is migrated directly. To improve the imaging quality of DDM in VSP imaging, we propose separating the wavefield into downgoing and upgoing components using Hilbert transform when reverse-time migration (RTM) is implemented in DDM, and the inverse-scattering imaging condition is further applied to the decomposed wavefields. The proposed method eliminates low-frequency noises and false images generated from the conventional cross-correlation imaging condition, and further enhance the illumination in the VSP imaging. Synthetic examples and application to a walkaway field data demonstrate that it can attenuate the noise and improve the imaging resolution effectively. By using DDM with inverse scattering imaging condition and wavefield decomposition based on Hilbert transform, VSP imaging using free-surface–related multiples becomes a practical complement for conventional VSP imaging.
Highlights
Vertical seismic profiling (VSP) surveys differ from surface seismic surveys or crosswell surveys in that the surface sources and the borehole receivers are used to record both upgoing and downgoing wavefields (Stewart et al, 1984; Hardage, 1985; Chang and McMechan, 1986; Hinds et al, 1996)
By using wavefield decomposition based on Hilbert transform, this kind of noises can be suppressed effectively
We present an effective method to imaging free-surface related multiples in VSP data
Summary
Vertical seismic profiling (VSP) surveys differ from surface seismic surveys or crosswell surveys in that the surface sources and the borehole receivers are used to record both upgoing and downgoing wavefields (Stewart et al, 1984; Hardage, 1985; Chang and McMechan, 1986; Hinds et al, 1996). The receiver well is placed near the target area to obtain sufficient reflection waves generated from the reservoir (Burch et al, 2010). The results of VSP imaging are restricted by the illuminated area of the primary reflections (O’Brien, et al, 2013). To greatly extend the subsurface illumination, free-surface related multiples recorded in the VSP surveys are used in the migration of VSP data (Yu and Schuster, 2001). To greatly extend the subsurface illumination, free-surface related multiples recorded in the VSP surveys are used in the migration of VSP data (Yu and Schuster, 2001). Jiang et al (2005)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.