Abstract

Conventional wisdom states that, since the average amplitude of vowel articulation significantly exceeds that for consonants, an assessment of spoken intelligibility in obscuring noise should primarily be limited by consonant confusion. Furthermore, in both English and Chinese, consonant discrimination is considered to be more important to overall intelligibility than that of vowels. In the unbounded case, the assumption that vowel confusion is less important than consonant confusion may well be true; however, at least two situations exist where the influence of vowel confusion may be greater. The first is where vocabulary-specific restrictions confine the structure of a particular spoken word to alternatives differing primarily in their vowel. The second is the prevalence of non-additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) interference, particularly impulsive noise which obscures only the vowel portion of a word, and similarly is present as a nonlinear effect of many time-sliced processing algorithms. This paper explores the issue of vowel intelligibility for spoken Chinese, where the confusion characteristics are complicated through the influence of lexical tone carried by the vowel in consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) structure utterances. Experimental evidence from multilistener intelligibility testing are presented to build toward an understanding of the characteristics of Mandarin Chinese vowel confusion in the presence of AWGN. Results are also isolated by carrier word consonants and in terms of the lexical tone overlaid upon tested vowels. In particular, several factors relating to issues such as vowel length, tone combination and the crucial influence of the /a/ (IPA ) phone are revealed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.