Abstract

Progress and decline: historical dialect in two texts by Hans Magnus Enzensberger The interpretation of history as a process of dialectical development has been one of the most important ideas of Marxist philosophy. Whereas earlier Marxists optimistically considered this process as steering inevitably towards a sociopolitical utopia, subsequent thinkers in the Marxist tradition, especially those identified as Neo-Marxists (like Theodor Adorno), had a more pessimistic interpretation of dialectics. Influenced especially by Adorno, German poet and social commentator Hans Magnus Enzensberger uses the concept of “historical dialectics” as a seminal theme in two of his literary works: “Mausoleum: siebenunddreißig Balladen aus der Geschichte des Fortschritts” and “Der Untergang der Titanic”. In these two texts the representation of the ambiguity of “Fortschritt” or historical development presupposes a more pessimistic account of the historical process. This ambiguity is present both in a bird’s-eye view of the historical process (“Mausoleum”), and in the focus on one specific historical incident (“Der Untergang der Titanic”). Enzensberger subsequently continues to consider the role of art within this dialectical context. In this article, both Enzensberger’s literary use of the philosophical concept of historical dialectics and its artistic implications (as identified by him) are examined.

Highlights

  • Die interpretasie van die geskiedenis as ’n proses van dialektiese ontwikkeling is een van die belangrikste begrippe in die Marxistiese filosofie

  • Whereas earlier Marxists optimistically considered this process as steering inevitably towards a sociopolitical utopia, subsequent thinkers in the Marxist tradition, especially those identified as Neo-Marxists, had a more pessimistic interpretation of dialectics

  • Enzensberger subsequently continues to consider the role of art within this dialectical context

Read more

Summary

Inleiding

Büchner-pryswenner Hans Magnus Enzensberger (gebore 1929) word as een van die belangrikste Duitse digters/literatore van die laaste helfte van die twintigste eeu beskou. Enzensberger se werk moet egter ook gesien word teen die intellektuele agtergrond van die na-oorlogse, jong Wes-Duitse republiek, waarvan die ideologies-filosofiese diskoerse grootliks gevorm en omvorm is deur intellektuele wat deel gevorm het van ’n losse filosofiese groepering, die sogenaamde Frankfurter Schule, Kritiese Teorie of Neo-Marxistiese-beweging. Een van die belangrikste figure hiervan wat ’n beslissende invloed op Enzensberger uitgeoefen het, was Theodor W. Tesame met die leier van die Institut für Sozialforschung, Marx Horkheimer, het Adorno ’n hoeksteen van die na-oorlogse kontinentale filosofie gelê met die publikasie van hulle seminale werk, die Dialektik der Aufklärung. Dit is juis in hierdie werk waarin Marx se interpretasie van dialektiese historiese onwikkeling enersyds geperpetueer en andersyds aangepas is by die heersende sosio-politieke omstandighede – ten minste soos laasgenoemde deur Adorno en Horkheimer geïnterpreteer is. Dit is dus vrugbaar om slegs enkele grondstellings van hierdie konsep baie kursories te verreken

Dialektiek
Dialektiek as werksmeganisme binne die historiese proses
Die kultuurindustrie: die rol van negatiewe dialektiek en kuns
Hans Magnus Enzensberger
Der Untergang der Titanic: eine Komödie
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call