Abstract
The Evolving Politics of Sovereign Wealth Funds Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) can provide needed liquidity and stabilize equity markets. Countries that are open to investment by SWFs are likely to benefit from their participation. Countries, such as France, that adopt protectionist policies, may see a dramatic fall-off in foreign direct investment, which is likely to be harmful to their economy at the worst possible time. The adoption by SWFs of the Santiago Principles, a voluntary set of principles without the force of law, is unlikely ta forestall tougher regulation by recipient countries that conclude that increased regulation of such funds is in their best interest. In the United States, the Obama administration and a Democratic-controlled Congress are likely to subject financial institutions, including private equity and hedge funds, to increased regulation. In this environment, SWFs may be unable to escape tighter regulation. If SWFs do not actively engage policy makers, they could be left with stricter rules and fewer investment options. JEL Classification : F21, F30, G11
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Revue d'économie financière
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.