Volunteers for Gore: The Impact of a Precinct-Level Canvass in Three Tennessee Cities

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessArticlesVolunteers for Gore: The Impact of a Precinct-Level Canvass in Three Tennessee CitiesDavid E. Price and Michael LupferDavid E. Price Search for more articles by this author and Michael Lupfer Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 35, Number 2May, 1973 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2129076 Views: 12Total views on this site Citations: 16Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Andra Gillespie Canvasser Affect and Voter Response: Results From National Focus Groups, American Politics Research 38, no.44 (May 2010): 718–758.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X09353503J. Kevin CorderJ. Kevin Corder is professor of political science, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008.Christina WolbrechtChristina Wolbrecht is associate professor of political science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. Political Context and the Turnout of New Women Voters after Suffrage, The Journal of Politics 68, no.11 (Jul 2015): 34–49.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00367.xScott D. McClurg Indirect Mobilization, American Politics Research 32, no.44 (Jul 2016): 406–443.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X03260581Peter W. Wielhouwer In Search of Lincoln's Perfect List, American Politics Research 31, no.66 (Jul 2016): 632–669.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X03255171David Niven The Mobilization Calendar, American Politics Research 30, no.33 (Jul 2016): 307–322.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X02030003005Anna L. Harvey PARTISANSHIP AS A SOCIAL CONVENTION, Rationality and Society 13, no.44 (Aug 2016): 462–504.https://doi.org/10.1177/104346301013004003Alan S. Gerber, Donald P. Green The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment, American Political Science Review 94, no.33 (Aug 2014): 653–663.https://doi.org/10.2307/2585837 Alan S. Gerber , and Donald P. Green The Effect of a Nonpartisan Get-Out-the-Vote Drive: An Experimental Study of Leafletting, The Journal of Politics 62, no.33 (Oct 2015): 846–857.https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00035 Peter W. Wielhouwer Releasing the Fetters: Parties and the Mobilization of the African-American Electorate, The Journal of Politics 62, no.11 (Oct 2015): 206–222.https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00010PETER W. WIELHOUWER The Mobilization of Campaign Activists By the Party Canvass, American Politics Quarterly 27, no.22 (Apr 1999): 177–200.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X99027002002Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell The Study of Election Campaigning, (Jan 1992): 1–23.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22411-1_1Blair T. Weir The American tradition of the experimental treatment of elections: A review essay, Electoral Studies 4, no.22 (Aug 1985): 125–133.https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(85)90003-4Susan E. Howell Campaign activities and state election outcomes, Political Behavior 4, no.44 (Jan 1982): 401–417.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986971Michael W. Mansfield, Ruth Ann Weaver Political Communication Theory and Research: An Overview, Annals of the International Communication Association 5, no.11 (Nov 2017): 605–625.https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1981.11923865J.A. Laponce The Use of in Vivo and Laboratory Experiments in the Study of Elections, International Political Science Review 2, no.44 (Oct 1981): 385–406.https://doi.org/10.1177/019251218100200402Lester M. Salamon, Stephen Van Evera Fear, Apathy, and Discrimination: A Test of Three Explanations of Political Participation, American Political Science Review 67, no.44 (Aug 2014): 1288–1306.https://doi.org/10.2307/1956549