Abstract
Summary Performing work is regarded as a key factor in the social inclusion of vulnerable persons. However, such social inclusion appears to be problematic in both mainstream and segregated settings. We aimed to examine whether volunteer work in integrated settings could be a suitable alternative. In a case study, we interviewed 13 vulnerable persons who were enabled—through a “Quarter Making” intervention—to perform volunteer work in a community setting. Data were analyzed using concepts from social epidemiology and social sciences. Findings Participation in the community gave respondents structure, and made them feel useful, meaningful, and proud, as well as a useful interconnected part of society. Interpersonal relationships provided them with superficial but meaningful contacts in the community, and helped them to transcend their social group, and—sometimes—build friendships. These experiences of improved social inclusion resulted in respondents reporting better mental health and wellbeing, and speaking in terms of feeling more normal and—sometimes—in terms of recovery. Applications To improve the social inclusion of vulnerable persons, performing volunteer work in integrated settings could be a suitable alternative for mainstream work or work in segregated settings. Interventions aimed at matching vulnerable persons to integrated settings, like Quarter Making, should preferably find a balance between creating bridging capital, to allow vulnerable persons to connect to “the normal world,” and offering bonding capital, to give them a safe place where they can “learn and relearn” to deal with the demands of modern society.
Highlights
Performing work is seen as a key factor that enables persons with mild intellectual disabilities or mental health problems to become socially included (Abbott & Mcconkey, 2006; Hall & Wilton, 2011; Stein & Santos, 1998)
Applications: To improve the social inclusion of vulnerable persons, performing volunteer work in integrated settings could be a suitable alternative for mainstream work or work in segregated settings
Interventions aimed at matching vulnerable persons to integrated settings, like Quarter Making, should preferably find a balance between creating bridging capital, to allow vulnerable persons to connect to “the normal world,” and offering bonding capital, to give them a safe place where they can “learn and relearn” to deal with the demands of modern society
Summary
Performing work is seen as a key factor that enables persons with mild intellectual disabilities or mental health problems to become socially included (Abbott & Mcconkey, 2006; Hall & Wilton, 2011; Stein & Santos, 1998). Persons with mild intellectual disabilities or mental health problems who perform work are less likely to feel lonely, less likely to have money problems, and more likely to be mentally and/or physically healthy (Lippold & Burns, 2009; Meulenkamp et al, 2015; Michon et al, 2002; Stein & Santos, 1998) Even though these vulnerable groups are generally highly motivated to work (Lysaght, Ouellette-Kuntz, et al, 2009; Stanley & Regan, 2003; Tompa et al, 2006), their employment rate lies significantly below that of the general population (Brault, 2012; Evans & Repper, 2000; Hall & Wilton, 2011; Lysaght, Petner-Arrey, et al, 2017; Meulenkamp et al, 2015). This discrepancy between the desire to work and the fulfillment of this desire is confirmed by parents of persons with mild intellectual disabilities, who report the lack of work or other
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
