Abstract

Simple SummaryPhysical activity is increasingly incorporated in cancer patient health care as a strategy to improve survival outcomes. However, its effects on treatment efficiency remains unclear. The aim of our preclinical study is to evaluate whether access to a running wheel could enhance the response to radiotherapy in mice with prostate cancer. We observed that voluntary wheel running (VWR) did not slow down tumor growth but appeared to modulate some parameters related to tumor perfusion. However, this did not result in enhanced response to radiotherapy. To investigate whether the lack of benefits on tumor growth observed with VWR could be attributed to the choice of physical activity modality, we conducted additional experiments comparing the effects of treadmill running versus VWR in two different preclinical models of prostate cancer. Only treadmill running was able to slow down tumor growth. Hence, the anti-cancer effects of physical activity seem dependent on its modalities.Physical activity is increasingly recognized as a strategy able to improve cancer patient outcome, and its potential to enhance treatment response is promising, despite being unclear. In our study we used a preclinical model of prostate cancer to investigate whether voluntary wheel running (VWR) could improve tumor perfusion and enhance radiotherapy (RT) efficiency. Nude athymic mice were injected with PC-3 cancer cells and either remained inactive or were housed with running wheels. Apparent microbubble transport was enhanced with VWR, which we hypothesized could improve the RT response. When repeating the experiments and adding RT, however, we observed that VWR did not influence RT efficiency. These findings contrasted with previous results and prompted us to evaluate if the lack of effects observed on tumor growth could be attributable to the physical activity modality used. Using PC-3 and PPC-1 xenografts, we randomized mice to either inactive controls, VWR, or treadmill running (TR). In both models, TR (but not VWR) slowed down tumor growth, suggesting that the anti-cancer effects of physical activity are dependent on its modalities. Providing a better understanding of which activity type should be recommended to cancer patients thus appears essential to improve treatment outcomes.

Highlights

  • Over the past 20 years, the relationship between physical activity and survival in cancer patients has raised considerable interest [1]

  • To evaluate whether the absence of anti-cancer effects observed with voluntary wheel running (VWR) in PC-3 xenografts could be attributed to the choice of physical activity modality, we investigate the effect of VWR versus treadmill running (TR) in both PC-3 and PPC-1 xenografts

  • To assess the importance of physical activity modalities on prostate tumor growth, we evaluated whether TR rather than VWR could alter tumor growth in vivo

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past 20 years, the relationship between physical activity and survival in cancer patients has raised considerable interest [1]. Numerous preclinical studies investigated the potential anti-cancer effect of physical activity in a wide variety of cancer types, with the majority reporting reduced tumor initiation or multiplicity and slower tumor growth in active versus sedentary rodents [4]. Several plausible biological mechanisms underpinning the benefits of physical activity on tumor growth have been identified and can be grouped into four main categories: (a) vascularization and blood perfusion, (b) immune function, (c) tumor metabolism and (d) muscle-to-cancer cross-talk [5] The identification of these mechanisms, as well as the gathering of epidemiological evidence showing improved survival rates in active versus inactive cancer patients, provides a rationale for the potential of physical activity to improve cancer treatment efficiency [6]. The aim of the current study is to evaluate whether voluntary wheel running (VWR) was able to improve tumor perfusion and modulate radiotherapy efficiency in a murine model of PCa

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call