Voluntary vaccination dilemma with evolving psychological perceptions

Abstract

Voluntary vaccination is a universal control protocol for infectious diseases. Yet there exists a social dilemma between individual benefits and public health: non-vaccinators free ride via the herd immunity from adequate vaccinators who bear vaccination cost. This is due to the interplay between disease prevalence and individual vaccinating behavior. To complicate matters further, individual vaccinating behavior depends on the perceived vaccination cost rather than the actual one. The perception of vaccination cost is an individual trait, which varies from person to person, and evolves in response to the disease prevalence and vaccination coverage. To explore how evolving perception shapes individual vaccinating behavior and thus the vaccination dynamics, we provide a model combining epidemic dynamics with evolutionary game theory which captures the voluntary vaccination dilemma. In particular, individuals adjust their perception based on the inertia effect in psychology and then update their vaccinating behavior through imitating the behavior of a more successful peer. We find that i) vaccination is acceptable when the expected vaccination cost considering perception and actual vaccination cost is less than the maximum of the expected non-vaccination cost; ii) the evolution of perception is a “double-edged sword” for vaccination dynamics: it can improve vaccination coverage when most individuals perceive exaggerated vaccination cost, and it inhibits vaccination coverage in the other cases.