Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this study was to perform a comparison between robust optimization and planning target volume (PTV)-based optimization plans using volumetric modulated arc-therapy (VMAT) by evaluating perturbed doses induced by localization offsets for setup uncertainties in larynx cancer radiation therapy. MethodsTen patients with early-stage (T1-2N0) glottis carcinoma were selected. The clinical target volume (CTV), carotid arteries, and spinal cord were contoured by a radiation oncologist. PTV-based and robust optimization plans were normalized at D50% to the PTV and D98% to the CTV, respectively. Both optimization plans were evaluated using perturbed doses by specifying user defined shifted values from the isocenter. CTV dose (D98%, D50%, and D2%), homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI95%, CI80%, and CI50%), as well as doses to the carotid arteries and spinal cord were compared between PTV-based and robust optimization plans. ResultsThe robust optimization plans exhibited superior CTV coverage and a reduced dose to the carotid arteries compared to the PTV-based optimization plans (p < 0.05). HI, CI95% and the dose to the spinal cord did not significantly differ between the PTV-based and robust optimization plans (p > 0.05). The robust optimization plans showed better CI80% and CI50% compared to the PTV-based optimization plans (p < 0.05). Plan perturbed evaluations showed that the robust optimization plan has small variations in the doses to the CTV, carotid arteries, and spinal cord compared to the PTV-based optimization plan. ConclusionsThe robust optimization plan may be a suitable treatment method in radiotherapy for larynx cancer patient.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
