Abstract

system. Treatment was delivered using 6/10 MV beam with one single 360 o arc containing 20 sectors. The MLC performed a full dynamic sweep in each sector. All the calculations were performed using a Monte Carlo algorithm, including the QA plans. Plans wereverified using the cylindrical ArcCheck QA device. AQA criterion of 3%-3mm was used to determine the plan passing rate. Results: In all cases at least 95% of the PTV received the prescription dose. The resulting coverage yielded a median prostate mean dose of 53.7 Gy [52.2 - 55.2 Gy] and a median PTV mean dose of 53.5 Gy [51.8 - 54.5 Gy]. Due to the proximity of PTV, the most stringent dose constraints were for the bladder wall and anterior rectal wall. The median bladder wall V25Gy was 9.3cc [8.8 - 13.8] and the median anterior rectum wall V50Gy was 1.9cc [0.7 - 3.5]. The urethra maximum dose was limited to less than 52.5 Gy. The median treatment time was 10:06 min [8:24 - 12:35] and the median number of MUs was 3630 [3137 4620] which indicated that most of the MUs were efficiently delivered at a high dose rate during most of the treatment (max dose rate 480 MU/min). The number of MLC segments decreased progressively as experience built up and the median was 185 [166 1108]. QA passing rates were fully satisfactory and above our threshold of 90% with a median of 95.95% [93.4 - 98.6%]. Conclusions: Highly conformal plans were generated and delivered using Monaco and VMAT. Very short treatment times were achieved, thereby improving patient comfort and reducing the risk of intra-fractional motion associated with long treatments times. QA results show excellent agreement between measurements and plans. Patients tolerated treatments well acutely.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call