Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Conventional Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Simultaneous Maximal Intraprostatic Boost: a Planning Comparison Study

Abstract

Aims Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a novel extension of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) where an optimised three-dimensional dose distribution may be delivered in a single gantry rotation. This optimisation algorithm is the predecessor to Varian's RapidArc. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of conventional static nine-field IMRT (cIMRT) and VMAT to boost as much of the clinical target volume (CTV) as possible to 88.8 Gy without exceeding organ at risk (OAR) dose-volume constraints. Materials and methods Optimal cIMRT and VMAT radiotherapy plans were produced for 10 patients with localised prostate cancer using common planning objectives: (1) Treat ≥98% of the planning target volume (PTV) to ≥95% of the prescription dose (74 Gy in 37 fractions); (2) keep OAR doses within predefined limits; (3) treat as much of prostate CTV (minus urethra) as possible to ≥120% of prescription dose (=88.8 Gy); (4) keep within maximum dose limits in and out of target volumes; (5) conformality index (volume of 95% isodose/volume of PTV) ≤1.2. Results VMAT and cIMRT boosted an average of 68.8 and 63.5% of the CTV to ≥120% of the prescription dose ( P = 0.002). All dose constraints were kept within predefined limits. VMAT and cIMRT required an average of 949 and 1819 monitor units and 3.7 and 9.6 min, respectively, to deliver a single radiation fraction. Conclusions VMAT is able to boost more of the CTV to ≥120% than cIMRT without contravening OAR dose constraints, and uses 48% fewer monitor units. Treatment times were 61% less than with cIMRT.