Abstract

Whereas time capnography (Tcap) is routinely displayed during mechanical ventilation, the volumetric representation (Vcap) is seldom used. We compared the diagnostic value of indices derived from Tcap and Vcap following ventilation to perfusion ratio () mismatch subsequent to experimentally induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and alveolar recruitment by elevating the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Lung injury was induced by iv lipopolysaccharide, whole lung lavage and injurious ventilation in anesthetized, mechanically ventilated rabbits (n = 26). Mainstream Tcap and Vcap were performed to assess normalized phase 2 (Sn2T, Sn2V) and phase 3 slopes (Sn3T, Sn3V) in the time and volumetric domains. Vcap was also used to estimate Enghoff’s physiological dead space (VDE). Lung oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) and intrapulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt) were derived from arterial and central venous blood gas samples. All measurements were made under baseline conditions, and, following lung injury, under moderate (6 cmH2O) and high PEEP levels (9 cmH2O). Lung injury deteriorated the PaO2/FiO2 (baseline vs. injured 466 ± 10.2 [95% confidence interval] vs. 77.3 ± 17.1 mmHg, p < 0.05) and compromised all mechanical parameters significantly, whereas Tcap parameters exhibited contradictory or inconsistent changes. Conversely, Vcap indices exhibited consistent changes and provided excellent diagnostic value in detecting lung-function deterioration subsequent to lung injury [area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 1.0 ± 0.0, 0.87 ± 0.22 and 0.86 ± 0.22 for VDE, Sn3V and Sn3V/Sn2V, respectively]. Elevated PEEP increased PaO2/FiO2 and decreased Qs/Qt, which was reflected only in the Vcap slope ratio (Sn3V/Sn2V, p < 0.05). Our findings demonstrate the limited value of Tcap to detect ventilation to perfusion ratio () mismatch, following severe lung injury. Conversely, indices derived from Vcap proved to be sensitive for detecting lung volume loss and alveolar recruitment. Therefore, promotion of Vcap is of paramount importance as a real-time, non-invasive, bedside monitoring modality to detect the development of and to follow-up the progression of lung injury in a model of ARDS.

Highlights

  • Clinicians are continuously challenged by the potentially deleterious pulmonary effects of mechanical ventilation

  • We evaluated the ability of capnogram dead space and shape-factor parameters to reveal alveolar recruitment subsequent to positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP) elevations in injured lungs, as this evaluation is potentially important for the optimization of ventilation strategy

  • Shape factors and dead space parameters obtained from volumetric capnogram reflect ventilation/perfusion defects, it has not been clarified whether volumetric capnography (Vcap) is an appropriate tool to assess severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and to detect lung recruitment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Clinicians are continuously challenged by the potentially deleterious pulmonary effects of mechanical ventilation. Continuous, reliable and non-invasive monitoring of V /Qmatching is of paramount importance in anesthesia and intensive care settings to titrate ventilation parameters, to detect ventilation-induced lung injury, and to guide ventilation strategies (Brochard et al, 2012; Theerawit et al, 2017). In this regard, capnography as a routinely applied continuous non-invasive bedside monitoring modality is gaining increasing attention, as it reflects changes in the homogeneity of alveolar ventilation and V /Qmatching (Verscheure et al, 2016; Lam et al, 2017).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call