Abstract

To purpose of this paper was to assess the feasibility of volumetric breast density estimations on MRI without segmentations accompanied with an explainability step. A total of 615 patients with breast cancer were included for volumetric breast density estimation. A 3-dimensional regression convolutional neural network (CNN) was used to estimate the volumetric breast density. Patients were split in training (N = 400), validation (N = 50), and hold-out test set (N = 165). Hyperparameters were optimized using Neural Network Intelligence and augmentations consisted of translations and rotations. The estimated densities were evaluated to the ground truth using Spearman’s correlation and Bland–Altman plots. The output of the CNN was visually analyzed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Spearman’s correlation between estimated and ground truth density was ρ = 0.81 (N = 165, P < 0.001) in the hold-out test set. The estimated density had a median bias of 0.70% (95% limits of agreement = − 6.8% to 5.0%) to the ground truth. SHAP showed that in correct density estimations, the algorithm based its decision on fibroglandular and fatty tissue. In incorrect estimations, other structures such as the pectoral muscle or the heart were included. To conclude, it is feasible to automatically estimate volumetric breast density on MRI without segmentations, and to provide accompanying explanations.

Highlights

  • To purpose of this paper was to assess the feasibility of volumetric breast density estimations on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without segmentations accompanied with an explainability step

  • Breast density can be assessed on imaging such as mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

  • The aim of this paper is to assess the feasibility of volumetric breast density estimations on MRI without segmentations accompanied with an explainability step

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To purpose of this paper was to assess the feasibility of volumetric breast density estimations on MRI without segmentations accompanied with an explainability step. Spearman’s correlation between estimated and ground truth density was ρ = 0.81 (N = 165, P < 0.001) in the hold-out test set. SHAP showed that in correct density estimations, the algorithm based its decision on fibroglandular and fatty tissue. It is feasible to automatically estimate volumetric breast density on MRI without segmentations, and to provide accompanying explanations. The volumetric density is defined as the volume of the fibroglandular tissue divided by the volume of the breast region. In these studies, the average Dice similarity coefficient for the segmented fibroglandular tissue is roughly 0.8, and can be as low as 0.6. Automatic checking of these segmentations is challenging in a clinical setting, since the ground truth segmentation is lacking

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call