Abstract
Total respiratory resistance (Rrs) can be computed from measurements of flow before and during a brief period of added resistance. This ‘added resistance’ method does not require measurement of total driving pressure (Pt). One of the assumptions of this method is that the change in Pt (ΔPt) is negligible during the time of increased resistance. To evaluate this assumption we measured both the volume exhaled during a brief imposition of an external resistor, and the total respiratory compliance (Crs) of 7 healthy volunteers. The mean volume exhaled was 18.6 ml, and the mean Crs was 88 ml/cm H 2O. The volume exhaled divided by Crs gives the change in total static elastic recoil pressure (ΔPel,rs), which is one component of ΔPt. The mean ΔPel, rs was 0.22 cm H 2O. Since the pressure exerted by contraction of inspiratory muscles (Pmus,I) opposes Pel,rs, we also estimated ΔPmus,I and subtracted it from ΔPel,rs to obtain ΔPt. The computed mean ΔPt during the time of added resistance was 0.045 cm H 2O. This value is quite small in relation to Pt during a spontaneous expiration at rest. We also studied 13 subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and found no significant effect of transient added resistance on intraesophageal pressure. We conclude that the assumption of negligible ΔPt should not prevent the added resistance method from being very useful, particularly when simplicity of equipment and testing procedure are important.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.